If God is good, why is there so much suffering?
Christianity does not answer this by explaining suffering away. It says God came into it. The claim is not that pain is secretly fine, or that every loss has a neat reason you will be shown one day. It is that the God being accused came down, was tortured and killed — and that he has promised to put an end to suffering rather than to justify it.
This is the hardest question anyone asks a Christian, and Christians should say so first. It is the one objection that has always had real force — and most of the time it is not really a question.
So the first thing to get right is what kind of answer is wanted. There are two completely different situations.
One is an argument: can a good and all-powerful God exist alongside this much horror? The other is a wound: someone has lost a child, and is asking why.
The same words will not do for both. Using the argument on a grieving person is a cruelty, even when every sentence in it is true.
The argument, stated at full strength
Take it seriously before you answer it.
If God is all-powerful, he could stop suffering. If he is completely good, he would want to. Suffering happens anyway. So something has to give: either he is not able, or he is not good, or he is not there.
And it is worth putting in the form people actually feel it. Richard Dawkins asks why a God who could intervene lets a small child have an eye eaten out from the inside by a parasite. Any decent person watching would stop it if they could. So why doesn’t someone who can?
That is the objection at full strength, and it is not a debating trick. It is the reason people leave.
That has real force, and Christians should say so. But look at what the argument needs in order to work. It needs one more claim, usually unstated: that a good and powerful God could not possibly have any reason we cannot see for allowing any of it.
That is a much bigger claim than it looks. To know there is no such reason, you would have to know a great deal about how everything fits together — and none of us is in a position to know that.
Not knowing a reason is not the same as knowing there is none. That does not prove God exists. It means the argument does not close.
The Bible does not tidy this up
What is striking, when you actually read it, is how little Scripture behaves like the neat answers written about it.
The book of Job is forty chapters of a man demanding an explanation. When God finally answers, he gives no explanation at all. He asks questions back — Job 38:4KJVWhere wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.: “Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?” The problem is never solved for Job. He is shown who he is speaking to.
And the Psalms are full of complaints made directly to God’s face. About a third of them are what scholars call laments — poems of protest, kept in the book rather than edited out of it. Psalm 22 opens: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”
Psalm 22:1KJVMy God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?Jesus quoted that line from the cross. The complaint is not something the Bible tolerates at the edges. It is in its own mouth.
Then there is John the Baptist. He is the man who baptised Jesus and called him the Lamb of God — as certain as anyone in the story. Later he is arrested for speaking against Herod, and while he is sitting in that prison he sends friends to ask Jesus a question.
Matthew 11:2-3KJVNow when John had heard in the prison the works of Christ, he sent two of his disciples, And said unto him, Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?Are you the one, or should we be waiting for someone else?
He had been sure. Then he suffered, and he was not sure any more. Jesus’s reply does not scold him — in the same passage he calls John the greatest man ever born.
Whatever else that is, it is not a book pretending that faithful people do not waver when life turns on them.
Then there is the shortest verse in the Bible. Jesus arrives at the tomb of his friend Lazarus, whom he is about to bring back to life. He does not give a speech about why death happens. John 11:35KJVJesus wept. — “Jesus wept.”
He knew exactly what he was about to do, and he cried anyway. Whatever else that means, it means grief is not a failure of faith.
A quieter problem inside the word “evil”
This one is worth handling carefully, because used badly it sounds like a trick, and the person opposite is usually in earnest.
To call the parasite in that child’s eye evil is to say more than that you dislike it. It says something is genuinely wrong — wrong whether or not anyone agrees, wrong in a world that had never produced a single human opinion.
But a purely material account of the universe does not obviously have room for that. It can describe what happens. It has a harder time saying what ought not to happen.
The usual reply is evolution: we feel horror at a suffering child because creatures without that instinct did not protect their young, and did not pass on their genes. That explains the feeling well.
What it does not explain is the judgement. It tells you why you flinch. It does not tell you that the thing is wrong — and “wrong” is what the objection needs in order to work at all.
So the argument cuts in an odd direction. The stronger your sense that this world contains real evil rather than merely things you would prefer otherwise, the harder it is to account for on the view that there is nothing but matter.
None of which touches the pain. It is not a comfort and should never be offered as one. It only means the argument is not the clean win it looks like.
What Christianity actually claims
Not that suffering is good. Not that it is imaginary. Three things.
That this is not how it was meant to be. The world is described as damaged, not as designed like this. That is why suffering feels like an outrage rather than just a fact. Your instinct that it is wrong fits the Christian description of the world — it does not count against it.
That God did not stay outside it. This is the part that is genuinely different from other answers. He did not send advice from a safe distance. He came, and was betrayed, tortured and executed. Whatever else you say about the Christian God, you cannot say he does not know what it is like.
That it ends. Not explained — ended. Revelation 21:4KJVAnd God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. promises that God will wipe away every tear, and that death, sorrow, crying and pain will be gone. That is not a justification of pain. It is its destruction.
Objections answered
Couldn’t God have made a world with free will and no evil?
Possibly. Nobody can settle that either way, and Christians should not pretend otherwise.
But notice how much the objection has to assume: that free creatures who always choose well are even possible, that such a world would be better, and that a world with real risk in it has nothing valuable that a completely safe one lacks.
Each of those is arguable, and none is obvious. The objection stays alive. It does not finish the job.
What about suffering nobody caused — disease, earthquakes?
This is the sharper version, and the free-will answer does not reach it. It should not be used as though it did.
The Christian claim here is wider: the damage is not limited to human choices but runs through creation itself, which the New Testament describes as subject to decay and waiting to be set free. That is a claim about the state of the world, not an excuse for it — and it is why Christians pray for healing instead of treating illness as God’s arrangement.
It does not explain one particular child’s cancer. Nothing does, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something.
Isn’t “everything happens for a reason” the Christian line?
No, and it does a great deal of damage.
Romans 8:28KJVAnd we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. says God works all things together for good for those who love him. It does not say all things are good. And it does not promise you will ever be shown the reason.
Genesis 50:20KJVBut as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. is the pattern. Joseph tells the brothers who sold him into slavery: “ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good.” Both halves are true at the same time. The evil is still called evil. It is not rewritten as a blessing in disguise.
Shared ground, and where traditions differ
All Christians hold
All the historic traditions hold that God is entirely good, that evil is real and not something he wants, that the cross is God entering human suffering himself, and that suffering will finally be ended rather than merely explained.
Catholic
Teaches that a Christian’s suffering can be joined to Christ’s, and take on meaning for others through that.
Orthodox
Frames it around the healing of a creation held captive by death, and describes salvation as restoration rather than mainly as a legal settlement.
Protestant
Emphasises that God remains in control even of suffering, with a long-running internal debate about how that fits with human freedom.
Related questions
Inspired by Wesley Huff on The Diary Of A CEO. The argument is theirs; the words here are ours.
Did this answer the question?